Skip to content

Categories:

A Collaborative Divorce Model for Attorney Representation

Tucson Divorce Attorneys and Tucson Family Lawyers seek to model themselves on the following model for client representation.

Shift our perspective, increase our skills, make different use of old tools.

Move from a view of conflict as a battle of wills to the creation of opportunities.

Are less concerned with rights than discovering interests and fulfilling needs.

Detach from the outcome, allowing our Tucson divorce clients to choose unpredictable outcomes.

Accept that the legal answer is only one possible answer for Tucson lawyers—because a judge is required by law to rule in a certain way, it does not control clients’ decision making.

Use their legal knowledge as a guide, not an absolute.

Trust that clients know what is best for them in the long term.

Guide clients from anger and disappointment to higher intentions and long-term views.

Plan forward, not look backwards.

Use community resources and focus on working together toward solutions.

Rely on the divorce Tucson team for answers. The lawyers don’t have to know it all.

Know that threatening to go to court is a violation of the principle that clients know what they want and need and have power to invent solutions that work.

Do no harm.

Posted in Uncategorized.

What You Should Know About The Cost of a Tucson Collaborative Divorce

WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE COST OF COLLABORATIVE CASES AND CLIENTS’ VIEWS OF COST IN DICUSSING COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE WITH POTENTIAL CLIENTS
The following, in an article by Linda K. Wray, JD, are results of a survey regarding the cost of a colalborative divorce. If you are a client intending to hire a Tucson divorce attorney or Tucson family lawyer for a Tucson divorce, you may be interested in reading this article.

Many of us have stated at one time or another that Collaborative cases, even those conducted with a team of professionals, cost less than cases conducted in the adversarial process. We base this claim on our experiences in litigation and in Collaborative cases. However, the cost of a Collaborative divorce case may not be insubstantial. Costs vary depending on the jurisdiction in which the case is located, the number of other professionals on the case, the model used and the difficulty of the case.

Second, by ‘adversarial process,’ we may be referring to cases that are fully litigated or that have gone through a protracted formal discovery process. Yet, the ‘adversarial process’ varies widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case. Many courts are moving towards or have fully incorporated a comprehensive settlement program including early neutral evaluations. And many cases conducted in the ‘adversarial process’ settle early in the process. Such variations in court procedures and cases render misleadingly simplistic contrasts between the ‘adversarial process’ and Collaborative Practice.

How then do we handle the topic of cost in initial meetings with potential clients? The IACP Research shows we do not necessarily need to contrast the cost of Collaborative Practice with the adversarial process in our discussions with clients. Based on 84 reported cases in the Client Experience Survey through August 24, 2009, cost was regarded as somewhat to very important in choosing Collaborative Practice over the traditional court process. However, the following benefits were ranked as more important than cost:

· A better outcome

· A process which would better focus on the concerns most important to the client

· A less confrontational and less adversarial process

· A more respectful process

· More control over the outcome

· A less stressful process

· Professionals who would work more as a team to help clients solve problems

· A process that better provided sufficient time to address all concerns

· A process better suited to the client

With the existing demographics of Collaborative clients (middle and upper middle class)3 , Collaborative professionals may want to focus on the value-added attributes above, rather than cost, in discussing Collaborative Practice with clients. This suggestion is buttressed by three important points:

· Collaborative clients are choosing to use an interdisciplinary process in over 50% of reported cases; 55% of cases reported by clients include a financial professional and 40% of such cases include a mental health professional.

· Clients report in 90% of cases that all professionals on their case were necessary to achieve their goals.

· Last, and perhaps most important to note:

o 83% of clients state that the fees paid to their lawyers are somewhat or very reasonable;

o 80% of clients state that fees paid to their mental health professionals are somewhat or very reasonable; and

o 76% of clients state that fees paid to their financial professionals are somewhat or very reasonable.

In sum, the IACP research suggests that we do not need to ’sell’ clients on the benefits of Collaborative Practice by claiming it is less costly than the adversarial process. Clients frequently choose Collaborative Practice to obtain benefits other than cost savings and are satisfied with the fees they pay to receive those benefits.

__________________________________

1 The average varies dramatically by jurisdiction. In California the average cost of a Collaborative case is $41,056. In Minnesota the average cost is $14,431.

2 47% of team cases, 54% of referral model cases and 29% of lawyer only cases are rated as difficult or very difficult.

3 The issue of making Collaborative Practice available to other demographic groups is a very important one, and it is addressed to some degree in the Uniform Collaborative Law Act. How to approach cost as Collaborative Practice expands may change based on the demographics of clients.

Posted in Uncategorized.

CAN YOU HAVE A GOOD DIVORCE

The followiong is an article by Sam Barrett from Moneywise Magazine. It is edited to be of local relevance to the Tucson divorce arena and to Tucson Family Lawyers.

Sometimes a parting of the ways is the only solution, but make sure it’s done with the minimum of fuss, hurt and expense. Sam Barrett answers your questions to help you get to grips with the best options for you.

Stopping smoking, getting fit, learning a new skill — New Year’s resolutions come in all shapes and sizes. But, for some, the new year means a much more radical overhaul, with more people starting divorce Tucson proceedings in January than at any other time of the year.

But whether it was a particularly poor Christmas gift or an excess of in-laws that proved the final straw for your marriage, it’s worth understanding the financial implications of divorce from a competent Tucson divorce attorney.

A good grasp of where you stand can help you reach the best agreement with your soon to be ex-husband or wife. Here we answer some of the most common questions that may arise when you decide to part company. Check with your Tucson lawyer for all legal specifics.

Q: I’d really like to move on as quickly as possible. How soon can we get divorced?

A: You’ll need to be married for at least a year before you can file for divorce and have sufficient grounds to satisfy the courts. This includes meeting at least one of five criteria.

These are: two years’ separation, with both the husband and wife agreeing to a divorce; five years’ separation if there’s no agreement to divorce; adultery; unreasonable behaviour; and two years’ desertion, although this situation is rare. “As long as you can tick one of these boxes you can file for divorce,” says Andrew Newbury, partner with legal firm Pannone.

“Unreasonable behaviour is the most common grounds for divorce, but you will have to cite reasons, which will be assessed by a judge.”

Newbury says it doesn’t matter who did what and, if the divorce is on the grounds of adultery, there’s no need to name the other person. “The courts aren’t interested; if they had to take all this into account, they’d grind to a halt,” he adds.

Q: I’m going to be looking after the children. How can I be sure my ex-partner will support them?

A: The power to determine, and enforce, child maintenance lies with the Child Support Agency (CSA) rather than the courts. “If a couple can agree a figure, and most do, this can be incorporated into the divorce agreement,” says Newbury. “If not, the parent who is looking after the children has to go to the CSA.”

The CSA uses a set formula to work out what should be paid. This is a percentage of the absent parent’s net earnings, depending on the number of children, the number of nights the children spend with the absent parent, and whether there are any other children living with the absent parent.

A calculator is available on the CSA website to help you work out what level of maintenance would apply to your circumstances.

Newbury recommends sticking with the CSA figures. “There isn’t much point deviating from these figures too much as the child support element of a divorce agreement is only binding for a year. Once the year is up, either parent can go to the CSA and it will revert to its formula,” he explains.

Q: What happens to our home and our other assets?

A: There’s no set formula for dividing marital assets. “The starting point in relation to the division of the assets is equal stakes, unless there’s a reason not to do this,” says Amandeep Gill, associate with legal firm Davenport Lyons. Provision for any children would be an obvious reason for an unequal split of assets.

Shorter marriages can see assets divided differently too. In these cases, the court might only take into account any wealth that has built up during the marriage.

If you’re unable to reach an agreement between yourselves, the court will take into account the welfare of any children and then look at factors such as the available assets, needs, resources, the length of the marriage, your ages and your contributions to the marriage.

Q: I gave up my career to bring up the children and run the home. Shouldn’t I be compensated for this?

A: Spousal maintenance is commonly awarded in the UK. “Maintenance takes into account the resources and needs of each party,” says David Lister, a partner in the family department at Mishcon de Reya. “If one party has given up work to look after children or support their partner’s career, this will be taken into consideration.”

Although spousal maintenance is usually awarded for life, it can end either at an agreed point or when the former spouse remarries. It does, however, continue to be paid if they move in with a new partner.

Further, if the person paying maintenance dies, their former spouse can lodge a claim against their estate for the maintenance they would have received. These rules only apply in England and Wales. “In Scotland, for instance, the law is different, and spousal maintenance is only payable for a short time,” Newbury adds.

Q: Will I have to pay maintenance to my wife forever? Could we negotiate a clean break instead?

A: Clean break is possible. “This does happen, especially where it’s a youngish couple who are both financially independent. Then there’s no real need for any ongoing support and both parties can go their own ways,” says Newbury.

Clean breaks also occur where there’s plenty of wealth involved, as one spouse can afford to pay a lump sum equivalent to roughly the annual amount times the number of years maintenance would be paid, which could be based on the former spouse’s life expectancy.

“A clean break can be risky for a husband if he pays a lump sum to his wife in lieu of maintenance. If his ex-wife remarries, maintenance stops, but he wouldn’t get anything back if he’d paid a lump sum,” says Jane Porter, partner and head of the family team at Lester Aldridge.

Q: What happens to my pension? I was the main earner, so it seems fair that my wife takes some of it.

A: For some, a pension can represent a significant part of their assets. In the past, couples would have to hand over other assets to offset a pension, but since December 2000 it’s been possible to split a pension, giving each person their own pot.

If a pension split is being considered, then you need to get a financial adviser or actuary to assess the value of the pension. They will then calculate how it should be divided, often giving the woman a larger percentage, as this would enable them to purchase the same pension income as their former husband.

Q: Do we have to go to court? Can’t we arrange the divorce without it getting confrontational and expensive?

A: It’s possible to oversee the entire divorce proceedings yourself without going anywhere near a solicitor, let alone a courtroom. In many cases, your solicitor can work with you, your spouse and their solicitor to hammer out an agreement that will prevent you having to go to court.

Another option is mediation, where an independent person — the mediator — works with both parties to reach a settlement. But make sure you get someone you trust. “It’s important that both parties trust the mediator as they may need to tell you things you don’t want to hear,” says Sarah Anticoni, partner with Charles Russell.

A newer process is collaborative law. With this, both spouses and their legal representatives agree to resolve all issues in four-way meetings outside of the court process. If this isn’t possible, then both parties must sack their solicitors and go to court.

Q: How much will it cost me?

A: Cost is another consideration, and one that might help stop the disagreements. “If it’s a relatively straightforward case and both parties reach an agreement, your legal bill is likely to be less than £5,000,” says Gill.

“If the financial arrangements are contested and it ends up in court, it could cost £50,000 or more.” Doing it yourself can cost less than £500.

Q: Second time lucky… But this time with a prenup?

A: Even if you’ve experienced a nasty divorce, there’s no reason why marriage shouldn’t work second time around. But, if you do decide to tie the knot again, you might want to consider a prenuptial agreement.

“Prenuptial agreements aren’t legally binding but they are one of the factors that can be taken into account in a divorce,” says Jane Porter, partner and head of the family team at Lester Aldridge.

To increase the chances of a prenuptial agreement being used in your divorce proceedings, you and your future spouse need to take independent legal advice a reasonable length of time before your wedding. The agreement also needs to be fair, or the court could decide to ignore it altogether.

It is possible that prenuptial agreements will be given more legal weight in the future. “They’re a common part of getting married in continental Europe and we might be brought in line, as the Law Commission is going to produce guidance on them in 2012.

We’re already seeing more people considering them as a form of asset preservation,” says Amandeep Gill, associate with legal firm Davenport Lyons.

David Lister, partner in the family department at Mishcon de Reya, prefers a post-nuptial agreement. These are drawn up in the same way as prenuptial agreements but after the couple are legally married.

“People get these drawn up if they feel things aren’t going well in their marriage. They are the exception rather than the norm, but they’re more binding than prenuptial agreements,” he says.

Posted in Uncategorized.

Tucson Divorce and Children

23 January 2010
By Cath Karlin

This is a news article by Cathy Karlin regarding children and divorce, and it pertain to Tucson divorce and Tucson family lawers and clients.

The start of a new year is traditionally viewed as being the busiest time for Tucson divorce attorneys.

With the typical pressures faced by couples over the festive period combining with the anxiety and stress of financial uncertainty in the current economic climate, experts predict divorce levels to rise during 2010.

Add to the mix the increasing use of the internet and social media sites and the chances of divorce are even greater.

Two out of five marriages end in divorce, and this number may be higher for a Tucson divorce, with an increasing number internet-related, and recent findings highlighting that one in five couples cited Facebook in divorce petitions.

Separation or divorce should not be entered into lightly. It is important to retain a competent Tucson family lawyer. There are significant financial and emotional implications to be considered.

One law firm has launched a divorce voucher scheme. But, if you are not lucky enough to receive vouchers to help with the cost of divorce from friends and family at Christmas, then there is another cost-effective option to consider.

Collaborative practice is without a doubt the most consistently efficient and economical option of all methods of professional conflict resolution. Rather than Tucson lawyers sending letters back and forward, couples are holding on to more of their hard-earned cash and working together sorting out any issues amicably with the help of their solicitor.

Divorce also impacts greatly on children, who are faced with the uncertainty that surrounds their parent’s separation. Collaborative practice allows clients to put their children’s interest to the fore.

It is important for anyone considering a separation or divorce Tucson to seek detailed advice from a Tucson divorce lawyer before taking any practical steps in relation to financial matters or, more importantly, in relation to the care and maintenance of any children involved

Posted in Uncategorized.

Divorce Lawyers On Your Side

The following is an article by Diane Dimond about family lawyers and divorce representation. If you are considering a Tucson divorce, you may wish to read this article.

Written by Diane Dimond
Lots of divorce lawyers aren’t going to like this column. It’s about a new way for the rest of us to think about legal representation and, for this city, to thik about Tucson Divorce Lawyers and Tucson Family Lawyers.
Upfront, let me say there’s always going to be conflict — people who disagree over business, property, divorce or next-door-neighbor stuff. But what if, rather than hire high-priced lawyers to duke it out in court over months or even years, conflict was solved in a better, faster, more productive way? It would still be legally binding — it just wouldn’t necessarily take so long or be so expensive. It definitely wouldn’t be so gut-wrenching.

Enter the idea called “collaborative law.” Here’s how it works:
The guiding principal with divorce lawyers or family lawyers who practice collaborative law, especially Tucson dvirce attorneys and Tucson family lawyers is that everyone agrees upfront to work together in a respectful way to reach a settlement. No pit bull lawyer tactics are allowed. No promising to wring dry the opposition, filing mounds of paperwork or hiring private detectives to dig up dirt.
And clients of collaborative law counselors sign an agreement promising there will be no yelling, name-calling or bickering about the past. Let’s face it, when you’re getting a divorce or suing your business partner or fighting with your family over an estate, it’s human nature to want to lash out with personal insults. That’s really counterproductive behavior. In collaborative-law cases, clients know that if the process becomes too combative, both the lawyers will resign rather than participate in the ugliness. And both lawyers promise not to be involved in any litigation that might result.
Collaborative law is all about the gentle compromise, the smoothest and quickest route to get clients out of unworkable situations. And if your case needs special expertise in a particular area — maybe a financial, labor law or even medical malpractice expert — the collaborative lawyer has a team of like-minded associates who will join the process.
The only time you go to court is at the end of the process to simply get the state’s approval of your agreement.
In the past, professional mediators have tried to fill this role, but many aren’t lawyers and mediation sessions are often structured so the complaining parties sit in different rooms while the professional runs back and forth delivering messages and trying to make progress toward a solution. No doubt mediation has proved to be extremely useful, but it can be a cumbersome process.
Now, with the collaborative law movement taking hold in states across the country, even top-notch mediators, like Lee Jay Berman, president of the American Institute of Mediation in Los Angeles, are embracing the trend and calling it a breath of fresh air for those in the conflict-resolution business.
“It brings lawyers back to being counselors at law and putting their clients’ needs first — by its very definition,” Berman told me. “And it brings outside consultants (therapists, accountants, etc.) into the issue in the way that they were intended — not as competing experts, paid to say the opposite, but as expert consultants assisting the team in reaching a mutually agreeable resolution.”
While all this might sound like a great new idea, the fact is it was conceived 20 years ago by a Minnesota divorce lawyer named Stuart Webb. He was frustrated about the constant adversarial approach to legal problem-solving, so he started a new practice seeped in the idea of cooperative compromise. His website’s opening line says it all: “Resolving divorce issues with dignity and support.”
Webb’s revolutionary idea of everyone joining hands for the client’s sake has already taken off. There are about 22,000 lawyers trained in collaborative law worldwide. “I just heard there are lawyers now practicing collaborative divorce law in Iran,” he told me in an astonished voice.
When I told Webb my theory that many lawyers might not be embracing his idea for fear it would limit their billing hours, he gently said: “The lawyer will still be making an hourly fee. They’d just be filling up their day with collaborative law cases. And they’d feel better about it at the end of the day.”
Webb was calling me during a break in a meeting of about 30 lawyers. “We were just talking inside about how we all got into collaborative law … how it re-energized those of us near burnout. I guarantee litigation lawyers don’t sit around and do that!”
In this financial day and age, anything that can resolve disputes outside the court system will help ease the burden of ballooning dockets and save taxpayers money. As citizens first, I’d think even the American Bar Association could get behind that.
I say let the collaborative movement spread! The next time you need a lawyer, look for one in your state who practices this type law. I think you’ll find a lawyer who’s more interested in achieving a just settlement than watching the meter run.

Home | Contact Us | Site Map | Email This Page | Media | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

© 2007-2010 INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF COLLABORATIVE PROFESSIONALS – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Posted in Uncategorized.

Divorce Mediation

Going through a Divorce? Tucson lawyer offers insights into common misconceptions about divorce mediation.
If you are going through a Tucson divorce and are trying to decide whether divorce mediation or collaborative practice is right for you, reading some of the most common misconceptions about mediation might help you with your decision. Generally, any Tucson lawyer who practices family law will take a divorce case, but the results can be very different.
Which leads me to the first misconception:
Misconception 1: All Tucson divorce lawyers both understand and are in favor of mediation.
Taking a closer look: (eliminate this: This a big misconception, and possibly a dangerous one). Divorce mediation is not the status quo among the legal community—in fact it is still a relatively new approach. Most attorneys in Tucson have little (eliminate this: or no) experience with mediated approaches, and many may view it negatively. Their reasoning is that parting couples should only negotiate through lawyers—a belief (eliminate this: line of thought) that overlooks the distinct advantages of mediation. Although these attitudes are slowly changing, spouses wishing to mediate their divorce should find a consulting Tucson attorney who is “mediation-friendly”.
Misconception 2: Divorce mediation is a more difficult process than just hiring a Tucson divorce attorney to handle the proceedings.
Taking a closer look: The reality is that any divorce involves (eliminate this: a certain amount of) information gathering and decision making whether the parties mediate or go through the adversary system. Mediation simply offers a streamlined approach to the information-gathering and decision-making processes. In contrast, settling in the adversary system is slow and expensive.
Misconception 3: Mediation won’t solve the tough issues.
Taking a closer look: After being informed about the legal options by the mediator, divorce mediation allows both spouses to discuss what they want (eliminate this: stand up for themselves and what they want) rather than have their divorce lawyers always speaking for them and sometimes telling them what to do. As a result, people who mediate often come out of their divorce with enhanced communication skills and self-confidence, as well as agreements they can really live with.
Misconception 4: Mediation slows down the process.
Taking a closer look: In nearly every instance, mediation streamlines the legal process in contrast to adversary negotiation or litigation.
Misconception 4: There’s no place for lawyers in mediation.
Taking a closer look: (eliminate this: Most consulting) Tucson divorce lawyers who (eliminate this: like myself) who specialize in the mediation approach will inform spouses of their legal rights and options, coach them through the negotiations, come up with creative settlement ideas, and prepare the necessary divorce documents.

Posted in Uncategorized.

Spousal Mqaintenance in a Tucson Divorce

In Tucson divorce, when you are using the services of an experienced Tucson Divorce Attorney, you may want a clear explanation of a rationale way to resolve a spousal maintenance issue. Your Tucson Family Lawyer or Tucson Divorce Lawyer should be able to provide such an explanation. The Tucson lawyer for your divorce Tucson can make this process more straight forward than it might otherwise seem. The following explanation by Peter Axelrod, a Tucson Divorce Attorney, seeks to do this:
In a divorce or legal separation case in Arizona, spousal maintenance (also called alimony) can be awarded. In order for this to occur, the spouse who may receive spousal maintenance must meet certain criteria. If spousal maintenance is paid, it has tax consequences for both the paying spouse and the receiving spouse. If the case involves children, the amount of spousal maintenance paid will also affect the child support obligation.

Should Spousal Maintenance Be Paid?
It may or may not be the case that you or your spouse meets Arizona’s legal requirements for spousal maintenance. When the requirements for spousal maintenance are met, one spouse may be required to assist the other spouse in achieving reasonable economic independence. This may occur through the payment of spousal maintenance for some period of time. In Arizona, there is no formula to determine whether spousal maintenance should be paid. There are general legal guidelines, but at best they only generally point the way in answering this question without providing specific answers. Because of this, an attorney must thoroughly evaluate your circumstances before making a spousal maintenance recommendation.

The general legal guidelines that are used to decide whether spousal maintenance should be paid are:

• Does the receiving spouse have sufficient separate assets for economic independence?
• Is the receiving spouse able to be economically independent through appropriate employment?
• Is the receiving spouse taking care of the parties’ small children?
• Has the receiving spouse contributed to the educational opportunities of the other spouse?
• Has there been a marriage of long duration?
• Is the receiving spouse of an age that precludes the possibility of economic independence?

How Much Spousal Maintenance Should be Paid?
Since there is no formula in Arizona for determining the amount of spousal maintenance to be paid, answering the following questions may help you make that determination:

• What is the couple’s standard of living?
• What are the receiving spouse’s reasonable expenses?
• What portion of these expenses can the receiving spouse pay through his or her own employment or other income, including interest income earned from investments?
• What is the “shortfall” between the receiving spouse’s expenses and what that spouse can independently contribute to meet these expenses?

• Then consider:
• What is the paying spouse’s income?
• What are the paying spouse’s reasonable expenses?

Lastly:
• Can the paying spouse reasonably afford to pay the “shortfall” amount needed by the receiving spouse to meet his/her expenses and still have sufficient income remaining to meet his/her own reasonable expenses?

If not:
• What other options are there to help the receiving spouse meet the “shortfall between income and expenses.

Your attorney should fully explore these questions to help you arrive at a reasonable spousal maintenance solution.

How Long Will Spousal Maintenance Be Paid?
In determining how long spousal maintenance will be paid, consider the following:

• What educational or employment plan will result in the receiving spouse either becoming employed and/or earning an income sufficient to support a standard of living reasonably similar to the one enjoyed during the marriage? You may need assistance from your attorney to help with this often-complex determination.
• How long will it take the receiving spouse to complete the plan?
• Is the plan reasonable given both parties’ circumstances?
• Are the paying spouse’s circumstances such that spousal maintenance can be paid for the time period requested?

Posted in Uncategorized.

DIVORCE ALTERNATIES IN THESE DIFFICULT ECONOMIC TIMES

WHEN YOU HAVE BEEN THROUGH A TUCSON DIVORCE AND HAVE UTILIZED THE SERVICES OF A TUCSON DIVORCE LAWYER, THERE MAY BE TIMES, ESPECIALLY IN THE CURRENT ECONOMY, WHEN IT MAY MAKE FINANCIAL SENSE TO CONTINUE TO LIVE TOGETHER. IF THE PROCESS OF THE EMOTIONAL DIVORCE (TUCSON) HAS BEEN RELATIVELY AMICABLE AND YOU ARE USING THE SERVICES OF A TUCSON FAMILY LAWYER, THIS TUCSON DIVORCE ATTORNEY CAN HELP YOU WORK OUT THE PARTICULARS OF THIS ARRANGEMENT. THIS TUCSON LAWYER CAN SUGGEST WAYS TO MAKE LIVING TOGETHER WORK.
THE FOLLOWING IS AN ARTICLE BY DEBORAH HECKER WHICH SETS OUT WAYS TO MAKE LIVING TOGETHER WORK AFTER YOUR TUCSON DIVORCE:

Not being able to get a divorce because the financial price is too high seems downright wrong. Nevertheless, the number of couples staying together because they cannot afford to live apart is rising. Couples are even finding themselves able to afford the divorce but still unable to afford the cost of separating and setting up individual homes – forcing them to continue to live together after the divorce. The potential for problems to occur in such circumstances is enormous. After all, there are reasons why couples get divorced, and those reasons do not disappear with the signing of the divorce decree

Remaining together after divorce is not for everyone. It is tricky, but it can work under the right circumstances. If a divorced/separated couple decides to remain together, the following suggestions will assist them to make their arrangements successful:
1. Be civil and respectful at all times.
2. Both parties and their children must be clear that the arrangement is temporary. There can be no mixed messages or false hopes for reconciliation. If that cannot be achieved, the arrangement may be inappropriate.
3. Discuss the time frame. Is there a specific date to move? If not, how will they know when it is time? What happens if one person wants to leave prior to the agreed time?
4. Set up arrangements for sharing household expenses. If there is no legal settlement, decide what money is shared and what is separate.
5. Be clear about how physical space will be used. If needed, make a schedule for exclusive use of certain rooms.
6. Agree on the way to describe the living arrangements to friends and family.
7. Create ground rules for bringing other people into the house.
8. If children are involved, identify the co-parenting arrangements.
9. Agree on dating and bringing new partners into the house.
Developing Separateness While Living Together
As A Divorced Couple
Living together as a divorced couple requires developing dual, seemingly paradoxical, skills; good team work and independence from one another. As a team, the primary tasks of the divorced couple living together are to resolve shared problems including dividing living space, co-parenting arrangements, household expenses and other practical matters. As individuals, each member of the divorced/separated couple has a responsibility to build a separate identity as a non-married person.

How can pain, disenchantment, and alienation—all normal feelings resulting from divorce—be reconciled with understanding and respecting each others’ needs? Is it possible for these seemingly paradoxical tasks to be integrated? For those divorced couples who are good candidates to remain together it is crucial that they develop a contract or some form of agreement which clearly articulates The ground rules for co-existing. This contract requires a commitment on the part of the divorced/separated couple to work together honestly and with integrity. The ground rules for co-existing. This contract requires a commitment on the part of the divorced/separated couple to work together honestly and with integrity.

The following are some ideas for the couple to consider if they find themselves in conflict with one another.
1. Consider going to see a marriage counselor, mediator or collaborative attorney to help resolve differences about practical matters, such as shared living space, parenting responsibilities, dating, etc.
2. Consider meeting with a financial planner to work out a formula for sharing living expenses. Chances are the couple will find themselves in monetary difficulties that were not addressed in the divorce decree. For example, what happens if one person loses their job while the couple is co-existing?
3. Consider consulting a parenting expert who can assist with helping children adjust to these unusual circumstances. Children are very sensitive to their parents’ unspoken needs and desires. If one parent hopes the temporary living arrangement will result in a reconciliation the children may pick up on this and develop false hopes.
Living together when divorced/separated requires that the former spouses work towards resolutions that meet both sets of needs. It means reframing their relationship so that despite the conflicts that may exist between them, they function as mutually respectful working partners, not adversaries. No one would suggest that this is an easy process. However, if the divorced/separated spouses wish for a successful separation, working together to survive uncertain financial times and unusual living arrangements is absolutely essential.

Posted in Uncategorized.

Living Together After a Divorce – Financial Sense?

WHEN YOU HAVE BEEN THROUGH A TUCSON DIVORCE AND HAVE UTILIZED THE SERVICES OF A TUCSON DIVORCE LAWYER, THERE ARE TIMES IT MAY MAKE FINANCIAL SENSE TO CONTINUE TO LIVE TOGETHER. IF THE DIVORCE HAS BEEN RELATIVELY AMICABLE IN USING IN THE AREA OF TUCSON FAMILY LAW, THEN THERE ARE WAYS TO MAKE LIVING TOGETHER WORK IN YOUR POST-TUCSON DIVORCE.
THE FOLLOWING IS AN ARTICLE BY DEBORAH HECKER WHICH SETS OUT WAYS TO MAKE LIVING TOGETHER WORK AFTER YOUR TUCSON DIVORCE:

Not being able to get a divorce because the financial price is too high seems downright wrong. Nevertheless, the number of couples staying together because they cannot afford to live apart is rising. Couples are even finding themselves able to afford the divorce but still unable to afford the cost of separating and setting up individual homes – forcing them to continue to live together after the divorce. The potential for problems to occur in such circumstances is enormous. After all, there are reasons why couples get divorced, and those reasons do not disappear with the signing of the divorce decree

Remaining together after divorce is not for everyone. It is tricky, but it can work under the right circumstances. If a divorced/separated couple decides to remain together, the following suggestions will assist them to make their arrangements successful:
1. Be civil and respectful at all times.
2. Both parties and their children must be clear that the arrangement is temporary. There can be no mixed messages or false hopes for reconciliation. If that cannot be achieved, the arrangement may be inappropriate.
3. Discuss the time frame. Is there a specific date to move? If not, how will they know when it is time? What happens if one person wants to leave prior to the agreed time?
4. Set up arrangements for sharing household expenses. If there is no legal settlement, decide what money is shared and what is separate.
5. Be clear about how physical space will be used. If needed, make a schedule for exclusive use of certain rooms.
6. Agree on the way to describe the living arrangements to friends and family.
7. Create ground rules for bringing other people into the house.
8. If children are involved, identify the co-parenting arrangements.
9. Agree on dating and bringing new partners into the house.
Developing Separateness While Living Together
As A Divorced Couple
Living together as a divorced couple requires developing dual, seemingly paradoxical, skills; good team work and independence from one another. As a team, the primary tasks of the divorced couple living together are to resolve shared problems including dividing living space, co-parenting arrangements, household expenses and other practical matters. As individuals, each member of the divorced/separated couple has a responsibility to build a separate identity as a non-married person.

How can pain, disenchantment, and alienation—all normal feelings resulting from divorce—be reconciled with understanding and respecting each others’ needs? Is it possible for these seemingly paradoxical tasks to be integrated? For those divorced couples who are good candidates to remain together it is crucial that they develop a contract or some form of agreement which clearly articulates The ground rules for co-existing. This contract requires a commitment on the part of the divorced/separated couple to work together honestly and with integrity. The ground rules for co-existing. This contract requires a commitment on the part of the divorced/separated couple to work together honestly and with integrity.

The following are some ideas for the couple to consider if they find themselves in conflict with one another.
1. Consider going to see a marriage counselor, mediator or collaborative attorney to help resolve differences about practical matters, such as shared living space, parenting responsibilities, dating, etc.
2. Consider meeting with a financial planner to work out a formula for sharing living expenses. Chances are the couple will find themselves in monetary difficulties that were not addressed in the divorce decree. For example, what happens if one person loses their job while the couple is co-existing?
3. Consider consulting a parenting expert who can assist with helping children adjust to these unusual circumstances. Children are very sensitive to their parents’ unspoken needs and desires. If one parent hopes the temporary living arrangement will result in a reconciliation the children may pick up on this and develop false hopes.
Living together when divorced/separated requires that the former spouses work towards resolutions that meet both sets of needs. It means reframing their relationship so that despite the conflicts that may exist between them, they function as mutually respectful working partners, not adversaries. No one would suggest that this is an easy process. However, if the divorced/separated spouses wish for a successful separation, working together to survive uncertain financial times and unusual living arrangements is absolutely essential.

Posted in Uncategorized.

When Children Grieve

When you are seeking a Tucson divorce in a case involving children, the Tucson divorce attorney you shoujld be looking for is one well versed in children’s issues. This Tucson family lawyer needs to be well grounded in the effects of divorce on children. The Tucson divorce lawyer for your divorce Tucson needs to be a Tucson lawyer who will listen to the needs of children. The following is an article taken from the Collaborative Law Review pertaining to children in the midset of divorce.

With the recent publication of Mike Mastracci’s excellent book Stop Fighting Over the Kids; Resolving Day-to-Day Custody Conflict in Divorce Situations, I found myself focused on the overwhelming struggles that divorcing children must face. Children do not understand the changes that are occurring around them. They are afraid of what is going to happen to them and, almost invariably, they are consumed with worry about their parents’ well-being. Can they reasonably expect their parents, who are faced with their own personal distress, to be able to reassure them? Or is this the time for the attorneys to step in and to advocate objectively on their behalf?

Divorce attorneys have a lot on their plates. In addition to the many legal challenges they must successfully resolve, they are faced with the daunting task of skillfully working through their clients’ emotional roller coasters without becoming passengers on that ride themselves. They must find the balance needed to maintain their professional boundaries while simultaneously empathizing with their clients’ needs. In making decisions about what is in the best interests of their clients’ children, this may mean guiding the client in a direction that conflicts with his/her personal custody and parenting preferences.

I am writing this newsletter on behalf of the children of divorce. My intention is to offer some insights and guidance about the losses and anxieties that divorcing children face so that attorneys who are making determinations about their futures are better equipped to do so.
WHEN CHILDREN GRIEVE
Children are affected by divorce as strongly as the divorcing parents are. Age can make a difference, helping or harming depending upon the family structure and the child’s emotional maturity level. For any child, however, a divorce between his or her parents is a deeply stressful event. Pain comes from several sources; a sense of vulnerability as the family fragments, grief over the loss of the intact family, grief over the loss of the non-custodial parent, intense anger in response to the family disruption , and strong feelings of powerlessness. Imagine all the emotions adults go through in divorce. Children go through every single one of them as well.

Children caught in a divorce are experiencing multiple losses. Any one of these losses is enough to break a child’s heart. Taken together, they are overwhelming. Among the losses for the child are:
…Loss of the expectation that the family would remain as a unit.
…Loss of familiarity and routines.
…Loss if safety.
…Loss of home or change to dual addresses.
…Loss of childhood and innocence.
…Loss of trust.
Children are taught to love, trust, and honor their parents. They learn conflict resolution from their parents. Imagine how disturbing and confusing it must be to children when their parents abandon their pledge to love, trust and honor each other and fail at the very conflict resolution techniques they have taught their children. How do parents teach their children about love and divorce simultaneously?

Fear of abandonment exists in all children. These normal fears of abandonment and loss are markedly intensified by parental divorce. The primary conflict children see in divorce boils down to the fear of losing both of their parents. They fear that parental love won’t be there when they need it and that their parents may even leave or abandon them.
EFFECTS OF DIVORCE ON CLIENTS’ ABILITY TO PARENT

The role of parent should not stop after divorce. Yes, the newly divorced parents may still be grieving, but they must not ignore the children’s grief. Not only have their entire lives been turned upside down, but so too have their children’s.

The ability of some divorcing parents to separate their needs from their children’s and effectively parent may be so diminished that they are capable of completely overlooking their children’s grief. While compromised parenting is an expected short-term consequence, there is serious potential for these changes in parenting style to become chronic if the parents do not focus on the relationship with their child.

There are other factors that make it easy for parents to disregard their children’s grief. Children often mask their grief with other emotions – most notably anger. Depending on their ages, and personalities, some children may not even be aware of the loss while others may be devastated by it. Some children deny their grief due to embarrassment, their own anger or a desire to hurt (or protect) their parents.

In her article, “Children After Divorce: Wounds That Don’t Heal” (The Psychiatric Times: Medicine and Behavior. 8: 8-11, 1989), Judith Wallerstein notes that in the wake of divorce, most custodial parents exhibit varying degrees of disorganization, anger, decreased expectations for appropriate social behavior of their children, and a reduction of the ability of parents to separate the child’s needs and actions from those of the adult. This kind of parental behavior can so overburden children that they may find themselves feeling responsible for their parents’ psychological well-being.
TIPS FOR ATTORNEYS TO ASSIST THEIR CLIENTS
SEPARATING THEIR GRIEF FROM THEIR CHILDREN’S

A good proportion of divorcing parents will be in a highly emotional state as they attempt to work with their attorneys in creating parenting arrangements and strategies. The parents’ focus is likely on themselves and not on the children. They will need to be reminded that the process is about the children’s welfare and not about theirs. In considering the needs of children, attorneys must separate their clients’ complicated emotional factors from the legal ones. Failure to do so can bias their ability to make objective determinations about the children’s welfare.

The following are pragmatic suggestions for helping clients better understand and meet the needs of their children during and after the divorce:
• The “best interests of the children” does not mean the immediate gratification of the client and his/her need for me-me-me. Over and over again, the focus should be pro-child and centered on building a safety net for the children.
• Children must be kept out of the middle – not just during the divorce proceedings but every day, no matter, how old the child, how challenging the circumstance, or how much the soon-to-be former spouse is despised.
• Parents must learn to put aside their stresses, to compartmentalize their adult conflicts and to remain present and available to the children.
• Raising a healthy child is a team sport that requires active contribution and collaboration from both parents. Success or failure depends largely on the cooperation, communication and coordination of mother and father.
• Some of the emotional hurdles that clients have to overcome include; unresolved grief over the failed marriage, resentment and competitiveness, and territoriality over the children.
• Children are not unaware of their surroundings. They easily pick up on their parents’ expressions and actions, often more so than their words. It is natural for parents to not want their children to feel bad. However, children feeling badly is not a bad thing. Dismissing children’s feelings is dangerous.
• Parents need to reassure their children early on and often that the divorce is not their fault.
• Arguing with one’s former spouse or criticizing them in front of the children is never acceptable.
• Children should never be forced to take sides in any dispute between their parents.
• Let children be children. It is easy, but wrong, to make adolescent or adult children confidants in dealing with parents’ recovery and fears. Even if children seem capable of handling these concerns, they rarely are.
CONCLUSIONS

In a perfect world, there would be no divorce. However, in the real world there is divorce. The collateral damage to children of divorce can be monumental. The consequences of divorce impact almost all aspects of a child’s life, including the parent-child relationship, emotions and behavior, psychological development, and coping skills. Therefore, there is a significant need for divorce attorneys to be cognizant of the broad spectrum of possible fall-out from a divorce so that they can provide sufficient representation for the children.

Posted in Uncategorized.